Milk and calcium good for the bones? Don’t think so

Share This Post

If I were to try and condense what I regard as good nutritional advice into a soundbite, I’d say ‘Eat like a caveman (or cavewoman)’. The idea here being to emulate the diet we as a species evolved on, and are best adapted to. There is, I think, abundant research that strongly supports this as being, in the main, the way to go. Though I appreciate there will be some who reject the notion of primal eating based on (I think) faulty paradigms such as saturated fat is bad and grains are good.

Another supposed anomaly here is dairy products. They do seem to be quite a recent addition to the diet (5000 years or so), so in theory not so important for health. Many nutritional commentators tell us, though, they are almost essential for our bones. Yet, the bony record from before about 10,000 years ago shows good bone health. How did we manage for more than 2 millions years without cow’s milk and now suddenly need it? Maybe, just maybe, we don’t need it at all.

I decided to revisit some of the science in this area recently. I found a quite-recent meta-analysis (amassing of similar studies) which looked at the relationship between milk consumption and risk of hip fracture [1]. I think fracture risk, by the way, is a much better judge of the value of dairy products than bone density. The whole point, supposedly, of having dense bones is to prevent fracture, so it makes sense to look at this (not density).

Neither in women nor men was there any relationship between milk drinking and risk of fracture (higher milk consumption was not associated with reduced risk of hip fracture).

In another meta-analysis, this same group of researchers looked at the relationship between calcium intake and hip fracture [2]. The results were the same  – no reduced risk of fracture associated with higher calcium intakes.

This second meta-analysis also looked at intervention studies, in which individuals were treated with calcium. These sorts of study trump the epidemiological studies discussed so far, in that they can actually prove ‘causality’ i.e. that, say, calcium causes few fractures.

Looking at four trials in which risk of hip fracture specifically was assessed, those taking calcium (compared to placebo) turned out to be at 64 per cent increased risk of fracture. Oh. Maybe all this milk and calcium is not such a good idea after all.


1. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, et al. Milk intake and risk of hip fracture in men and women: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Oct 14. [Epub ahead of print]

2. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, et al. Calcium intake and hip fracture risk in men and women: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86(6):1780-90.

More To Explore

Walking versus running

I recently read an interesting editorial in the Journal of American College of Cardiology about the relative benefits of walking and running [1]. The editorial

We uses cookies to improve your experience.